Tags: fishing
www.canlii.org/en/ns/nssc/doc/2013/2013nssc284/2013nssc284.h...
This case was heard in the Nova Scotia Supreme Court. Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 recognizes and affirms the existing Aboriginal and treaty rights of Aboriginal peoples in Canada. In R v Marshall, 1999 CanLII 665 (SCC) a ...
nslegislature.ca/sites/default/files/legc/statutes/fisheries...
This Act revises the outstanding fisheries law and promotes programs to encourage the development of a sustainable fishery. It sets standards for aquaculture, harvesting, and fish processing, and expands the recreational fishery. It also outlines the requ ...
www.canlii.org/en/ns/nspc/doc/2004/2004nspc55/2004nspc55.htm...
This case was heard in the Nova Scotia Provincial Court and followed the motion in R. v. McDonald, 2003 NSPC 34. The Defendant was one of a number of Indigenous fishermen who were charged with obstruction, assault, and uttering threats after fisheri ...
www.canlii.org/en/ns/nssc/doc/2013/2013nssc434/2013nssc434.h...
This case was heard in the Nova Scotia Supreme Court. In 2001, the Nova Scotia Provincial Court sentenced Mr. Babin to pay a fine for having fished using gillnets in an unauthorized manner in violation of the federal Fisheries Act. At that tri ...
www.canlii.org/en/nb/nbqb/doc/1986/1986canlii5166/1986canlii...
This case was heard in the New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench, Trial Division. The appellants in this case were Mi’kmaq. Mr. Augustine was a member of the Red Bank Indian Reserve. The others were members of the Eel Ground Indian Reserve. The app ...
www.canlii.org/en/ns/nspc/doc/2009/2009nspc45/2009nspc45.htm...
This case was heard in the Nova Scotia Provincial Court. Mr. Boudreau was charged with violating three regulations that had been made under the federal Fisheries Act. He was charged with breaking the conditions of a communal fishing license, fi ...
www.canlii.org/en/ns/nssc/doc/2010/2010nssc317/2010nssc317.h...
This case was heard in the Nova Scotia Supreme Court and was an appeal of the decision in R. v. Boudreau, 2009 NSPC 45. The respondent, Gordon Andrew Boudreau, had been charged under section 7 of the Aboriginal Communal Fishing Licences Regulat ...
www.canlii.org/en/ns/nsca/doc/1981/1981canlii2722/1981canlii...
This case was heard in the Nova Scotia Supreme Court, Appeal Division. The appellant, William Raymond Cope, was charged and at trial convicted of possessing more trout than was permitted under Nova Scotia's Fishery Regulations. Mr. Cope was Mi'kmaw ...
www.canlii.org/en/nb/nbpc/doc/2003/2003nbpc4/2003nbpc4.html
This case was heard in the New Brunswick Provincial Court. The defendant, Mr. Daniel Daigle, was charged with violating section 23(1.1)(b) of Regulation 82-103 of the New Brunswick Fish and Wildlife Act by possessing a trout that was more than ...
www.canlii.org/en/nb/nbqb/doc/2004/2004nbqb79/2004nbqb79.htm...
This case was heard in the New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench, Trial Division, and was an appeal of R v Daigle, 2003 NBPC 4 (CanLII). At trial, Mr. Daigle had been found guilty of violating section 23(1.1)(b) of Regulation 82-103 of the New Brunsw ...
www.canlii.org/en/nb/nbpc/doc/1983/1983canlii3883/1983canlii...
This case was heard in the New Brunswick Provincial Court. The three accused were found in possession of two Atlantic salmon that did not have tags attached to them, which violated section 57(1) of the New Brunswick Fish and Wildlife A ...
www.canlii.org/en/ns/nsca/doc/1990/1990canlii2412/1990canlii...
This case was heard in the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal. The appellants were Mi’kmaq. They were accused of fishing in a time, manner, and place that violated the terms of the federal Fisheries Act. The appellants had been fishing for food. The ...
www.canlii.org/en/ns/nspc/doc/2003/2003nspc20/2003nspc20.htm...
This case was heard in the Nova Scotia Provincial Court. The defendant, Peter Francis, was a Mi’kmaw fisherman engaged in a lobster fishery who had been charged under the Atlantic Fishery Regulations with fishing for lobsters without being auth ...
www.canlii.org/en/ns/nspc/doc/2011/2011nspc36/2011nspc36.htm...
This case was heard in the Nova Scotia Provincial Court. Mr. LaPorte was charged with committing an offence under the federal Fisheries Act by fishing in a closed area in violation of section 7 of the Aboriginal Communal Fishing Lice ...
www.canlii.org/en/ns/nsca/doc/1997/1997canlii14992/1997canli...
This case was heard in the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal. Donald Marshall Jr. was convicted of offences under the federal Fisheries Act, the Maritime Provinces Fishery Regulations, and the Fishery (General) Regulations after catc ...
www.canlii.org/en/ns/nspc/doc/2016/2016nspc14/2016nspc14.htm...
This case was heard in the Nova Scotia Provincial Court. The accused were Mi'kmaq and registered members of the Waycobah First Nation in Cape Breton. They were charged with violating the federal Fisheries Act by fishing salmon at a t ...
www.canlii.org/en/ns/nssc/doc/2018/2018nssc141/2018nssc141.h...
This case was heard in the Nova Scotia Supreme Court. It was an appeal of R v Martin, 2016 NSPC 14 (CanLII). The respondents were Mi’kmaq and members of Waycobah First Nation. They were charged with fishing in a way that violated an Aboriginal ...
www.canlii.org/en/nb/nbqb/doc/1988/1988canlii7758/1988canlii...
This case was heard in the New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench, Trial Division The appellants in this case were Dwight Bear, Gerald Bear, and Mr. Nicholas. Dwight Bear was charged with violating section 38 of the federal Fisheries Act by willf ...
www.canlii.org/en/ns/nssc/doc/2003/2003nssc164/2003nssc164.h...
This case was heard in the Nova Scotia Supreme Court. The Respondent, Jerome Paul, was a Mi'kmaw fisher from Indian Brook (Sipekne'katik) First Nation who fished for snow crab under a licence that had been granted by his community under a system that the ...
www.canlii.org/en/nb/nbqb/doc/1980/1980canlii3142/1980canlii...
This case was heard in the New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench, Trial Division. Mr. Saulis had been acquitted by the New Brunswick Provincial Court. In this case, the Crown appealed that decision. Mr. Saulis had been charged with violating the federal&n ...